Hollywood Movies and Predictive Programming

Hollywood the marketing tool of the New World Order

1. Culture Industry
2. Hollywood as a global film Industry
3. The power of movies
4. Things Hollywood push
5. What is Predictive Programming
6. Recurring predictive programming themes

 

Culture Industry

Films are one of the most powerful propaganda medium, they never were sources of just entertainment. Hollywood movies apart from peddling war propaganda also prepares people for the coming changes that the elite have planned.
It’s not just the movies but the culture industry in general. By Culture Industry I mean the use of diverse sources of entertainment to form a dominant culture (use of music, movies, fashion, video games, novels, magazines etc as cultural weapons).
The term culture industry was coined by the Frankfurt School philosophers, Theodor Adorno (1903–1969) and Max Horkheimer (1895–1973), and was presented as critical vocabulary in the chapter “The Culture Industry: Enlightenment as Mass Deception”, of the book Dialectic of Enlightenment (1944), wherein they proposed that popular culture is akin to a factory producing standardized cultural goods—films, radio programmes, magazines, etc.—that are used to manipulate mass society into passivity. ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Culture_industry)

Hollywood as a global film Industry

Hollywood movies are watched around the globe and local movie makers copy what is being turned out by Hollywood. Hollywood is the ultimate propaganda tool to create global culture. Just 6 major film studios (Universal Pictures, Paramount Pictures, Warner Bros. Pictures, Walt Disney Pictures, Columbia Pictures, 20th Century Fox) that are part of six diversified media conglomerates dominate the hollywood, whose various film production and distribution subsidiaries collectively command approximately 80–85% of U.S. box office revenue.
(Source wiki https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Major_film_studio)

The sector could be defined as an oligopoly, with few (six at the present time) major players, all units of publicly traded media and entertainment conglomerates, accounting for the large majority of the product distributed in the United States and globally. The Hollywood studios, both domestically and internationally have a clear leadership at the box-office. Data from Box Office Mojo (http://www.boxofficemojo.com) report that over the period 2001–2006, the market share of the six Hollywood studios (considered within their conglomerates) averaged approximately 80% or more in the US theatrical market (Amobi and Donald 2007a, p. 7). Also globally, the six Hollywood studios consistently rank at the top of worldwide charts in approximately the same period, as reported by Show biz data (http://www.showbizdata.com). In particular, Warner Bros. ranked first with 16.2% of the global theatrical gross in 2007, Sony/Columbia Tristar in 2006 with 16.4%, Warner Bros. in 2005 and 2004 with 15.7 and 14.2%, respectively, and Buena Vista International (the distribution arm of the conglomerate Disney) in 2003 with 18.1%. In the same 5 year period, only once was there a non-US or non-Hollywood affiliated distributor among the top 10 positions in the share of global gross theatrical revenue (the Japanese Toho ranking tenth in 2006). –
The Digital Glocalization of Entertainment by Paolo Sigismondi

The power of movies

Movies can inspire, motivate or even demoralize people on a large scale. Think of the last time that you have been mentally lost while watching a movie, spellbound staring at the screen, losing all sense of time and place, like it happens in a hypnotic state. Forgetting for the moment being that it’s all fiction and scripted. Almost in a trance state watching fictional characters being played by actors, you felt all the emotions, you felt good, angry and horrified, the scenes and ideas remained in your mind. You may even have thought of them over and over again. You discussed them later with your family and friends, even years after you watched a movie. This shows how powerful the effects of movies can they can be. Movie making is an art, storyline is written well, all complicated concepts are simplified and the underlying message is communicated very well. Very little is truly left for the viewer to think over during the movie and he or she watches all the scenes spellbound. He doesn’t need to pause to think anything, because everything has been presented so well.

The technique of using theatre and other forms of art as a weapon is very old and has been used since ancient times. Plato talked about using arts to mold people’s mind in his book the Republic. Plato advised censorship of literature for schools and advocated control of poetry, music, painting, sculpture and architecture. (Mind Control in the US by Steve Jacobson).

Art is powerful, and therefore dangerous Poetry, drama, music, painting, dance, all stir up our emotions. All of the arts move people powerfully. They can strongly influence our behavior, and even our character. For that reason Plato insisted that music (especially music), along with poetry and drama and the other arts, should be part of the education of young citizens in his ideal republic, but should be strictly censored. (http://users.rowan.edu/~clowney/Aesthetics/philos_artists_onart/plato.htm)

Things Hollywood push

Hollywood and Culture Industry is not just about predictive programming, It promotes or pushes numerous agendas. Glorification of violence and hyper sexualization have been its favorite agendas for a long time. Sex and violence have always existed in movies. Apart from that they push things like Feminism, Eugenics, Terrorism hype, Gender Bending, Historical Revision (false histories of World Wars, Vietnam War, Native Americans etc), Mind Control (specially there are reference to MK Ultra and monarch programming), War Propaganda, Military Recruitment.
Movies, Music videos, TV Shows etc have a lot of agendas to promote.

What is Predictive Programming ?

According to a wikipedia definition

Predictive programming, a theorized method of mass mind control, proposes that people are conditioned, through works of fiction, to accept planned future scenarios. Researcher Alan Watt defines this phenomenon as “the power of suggestion using the media of fiction to create a desired outcome” .

That definition by wiki isnt too detailed but it does give a good idea.

The idea of Predictive Programming is simple, the populace is prepared or programmed in advance for the coming changes with the help of fiction. It is an act of psychologically engineering the masses. Radical changes would be rejected by the people and a conditioning process is required to make them acceptable, this conditioning is done indirectly using fictional sources like movies and tv programs. In this way people are exposed to the ideas and concepts of the desired changes as they are interwoven in the storylines of movies, tv shows, music videos, novels etc. After this has been done for a long period of time, slowly the changes are implemented and become the new norm. This process of psychologically engineering people for the future with the help of movies and other forms of entertainment is called predictive programming. People are trained unknowingly for the coming changes subtly with the help of fiction. Its a form of mind control. Why predictive programming is necessary is because It’s difficult to break people’s habits and customs, they like familiarity and routine. You can’t just order people to march towards a change. You first need them to prepare them.
The desired future concepts and ideas like for example transhumanism are present everywhere in popular culture. All these ideas and concepts are embedded in the collective psyche through fiction. They were already present there in the public subconscious mind before becoming reality.

This is the how the process of predictive programming works

1. Desensitize (exposure)
2. Repetition (conditioning)
3. Multiple platforms to convey the messages (music, fashion, novels etc)
4. Slowly and systematically the concepts are normalized (successful conditioning)
5. People accept the changes as normal and natural (desired outcome)

Desensitize – Expose the public through movies to a new idea or concept for example humans and robots merging. As its fiction so people won’t oppose any such suggestion, and consider it as simple fantasy. With movies you can show the public any bizarre, absurd, twisted content because it’s all fake after all. People don’t react strongly and watch it as their censors are down. They aren’t judging anything, duped into thinking it’s just harmless entertainment. Desensitization means the state of shock and anxiety have been resolved. People would no longer feel or see the change as awkward, surreal, bizarre, absurd, disgusting and instead would become used to it and accustomed. They would no longer feel disturbed or uneasy. Also too much investigation won’t be carried out by average man as he would form preconceived ideas and beliefs. In fact he would be leaning to think in favour of the changes.

Repetition – Repetition starts to hard wire the concept in the public mind. Somehow creating a permanent place in the subconscious mind. Repetition means conditioning, more and more movies show the same things again and again. The public mind is inundated with the underlying concept for decades. (for ex Transhumanism).

Other forms of entertainment like music videos, tv shows, fashion magazines, novels, comics pushes the same themes, the underlying concepts are present everywhere and its not just the movies.
People become used to watching the same things year after year and through different mediums. They become part of the collective psyche. They become like any other normal thing. After successful exposure over a period of time, the changes are presented to the public. Fiction becomes Fact. People don’t react strongly and don’t protest in any way. As if it’s all a natural progression. For example Scientists are openly advocating and governments are planning to implement a number of transhumanistic changes like using robotic soldiers. (The U.S. Army Is Turning to Robot Soldiers https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-05-18/the-u-s-army-is-turning-to-robot-soldiers).

Would had all this been possible without the help of the culture industry ? would people have reacted the same way if not conditioned through fiction. ? I don’t think so. Changes are first introduced through movies. The concepts and ideas are incorporated in the story line. Movies are assisted by tv shows, cartoons, novels, comics etc. After enough exposure through these mediums of fictional entertainment, the changes are publicly announced and are generally accepted by the masses. The authorities don’t have to face much rebellion and disapproval, as the masses have been already programmed to accept the changes.
If changes are implemented without the proper conditioning, people will oppose them and reject them. They can clearly analyze what dangers they possess and how they may affect them. The elite agenda would be halted. So a conditioning process is essential to accomplish public consent.
Movies are not only about entertainment but also gradual conditioning of the unsuspecting public to certain ideas, concepts and changes. Movies are great ways to program the people and especially the youth to a specific vision of the future. Police brutality in movies and tv shows became reality, Biometric ID card system is another good example of the successful use of predictive programming.

Why they succeed

As people think movies are all about entertainment for viewers and money for producers, they never stop watching them, people never suspect that movies can be used to program them. If the Nazi party manufactured or financed a movie, people would boycott it or would watch it with skepticism, people don’t think the same way regarding Hollywood movies because they believe they are created without any agenda and purely for entertainment reasons, contrary to the popular belief, Hollywood movies have been from their very inception used as  vehicles of propaganda and tons of information is out there that clearly documents the connection that the CIA and Pentagon have with Hollywood movie makers. Case in point

After the 9/11 terrorist attacks, George W. Bush’s Deputy Chief of Staff, Karl Rove, invited almost four-dozen of the Hollywood power elite to the Beverly Peninsula Hotel and asked for help garnering support for the neocon policy agenda, including wide-ranging homeland security measures and the waging of war in Afghanistan and Iraq. Following the meeting jingoistic war films such as Black Hawk Down, We Were Soldiers and Behind Enemy Lines were rushed into cinemas. (https://www.theeuropean-magazine.com/guy-westwell–2/6354-film-as-propaganda)

As the myth of neutrality prevails, People’s guard is down and their minds are open to suggestion. As Hoffman says real sales pitch begins when people can’t see the advertisement of the propagandist. They fail to realize that movies are not just made for entertainment purpose only but also for other reasons. The main reason being to program the minds of the viewers for the acceptance of certain ideas and concepts.

Recurring Predictive Programming Themes

Below are some recurring themes (what are the elites programming the public mind with).
Keep in mind that some movies may have more than one theme. Like Matrix (Transhumanism, Dystopia, New Age).

Transhumanism – A common trend since the 1970s. Although the first example of a transhumanist movie can be of Metropolis released in 1927. All the transhumanist concepts have been present there in movies, things such as androids, merging of humans and machines, advanced AI, virtual reality, borg, clones, chimeras, mind uploading etc have been subjects of a number of movies, tv shows, music videos, fashion magazines and novels. Some example of movies pushing this theme are Island, Lucy, Blade Runner, Terminator, Matrix, Moon, Transformers, Johnny Mnemonic.

Dehumanization – Hollywood has been busy churning out movies full of gore and blood. Ugliness is everywhere in film and TV, isn’t art about beauty ? Dehumanization is a weapon of war. We are being dehumanized, this means we are the enemies.  These gore movies keep portraying merciless torture, horrific murders, mutilation, abuse and all kinds of depraved and despicable content. Why are they making us watch all this ? These gore movies are made for a wider agenda to remove humanity and empathy. People don’t feel when they see such suffering and horrendous acts in real life. They are trained to watch such content consistent basis and get used to it. It’s like turning people into sadistic psychopaths, just like what the elites are. We are unknowingly conditioned to see humans as just like any other animal. Human life has lost value. Is Hollywood trying to normalize the abnormal. Apart from movies like Saw and Hostel we also have music videos, tv shows and even fashion magazines that are full of dehumanizing content. The movie Hostel is pretty interesting, it’s about elite torture rings. Do such elite torture rings exist in real life ? are the makers of the movie secretly trying to divert our attention to that fact ?
Hollywood is busy exposing the public constantly to unsettling scenes of torture, gruesome murders, over the top violence, horrific abuse, mind control and everything else that is low and despicable.
Why create such debased movies. To create a debased culture it seems. They really like to show graphic content that will give nightmares to the audience, almost a form of psychological torture.  Are they doing all this to get people ready for the coming planned  cull and don’t want people to empathize with someone savagely killed by police or military, not to give a second look at the victim as they have got used to watching ten times more worse stuff, is it done to remove humanity ? I think so, good way for preparing the masses for the coming real life gorefest as total martial law will be instituted.  The violence and torture is so realistic these days as technology continue to progress, that it seems almost like watching a snuff film. Maybe one day live torture and death will become a new form of entertainment, like it happens in the movie Death Race, and just like now, people wont have a problem with that in the future. The fictional world of Videodrome has unfortunately become reality.

Videodrome (1983 Canadian movie) in which the masses become obsessed with the lurid sex and gore tv show.

Disaster Movies – Another recurring theme is of disaster movies with all kinds of catastrophe, cataclysm and doomsday scenarios.  In these movies we witness all kinds of tragedies including outbreak of pandemic diseases, natural disasters like asteroid collisions, earthquake, volcanic eruption etc. In reaction to all this, whole countries and even the entire planet gets in panic and disruption after that what follows is lawlessness, chaos, anarchy, rioting, massive food shortages and mass deaths become the new norms. Example- San Andreas, 2012, Contagion, Geostorm etc. (Are the elites going to trigger these disasters themselves using HAARP technology or Biological Warfare in the future ?).

Dystopia – Movies along this theme are in a futuristic setting and promulgate ideas like the world state, totalitarian system characterized by militarized police, total surveillance, people need a pass to move out of their fixed zones, everyone is drugged in order to suppress emotions and rebellious thoughts, people are designed for their work, genetically engineered, even killed after a certain age, no freedom or rights only obedience to the state is acceptable. Highly planned society with biometric ID cards, databases, euthanasia, genetically engineered life forms, rationing, thought control using chemicals and drugs, All kinds of methods to control the public are used. Even the natural environment has changed drastically and people are forced to live in underground cities, with no sunlight, contaminated air etc. Hollywood movies have a very dark vision of the future. Examples – Code 46, Gattaca, THX 1138, Equilibrium, Minority Report etc.

Occult & New Age – Occult invasion of the culture industry is not something new but it has increased a lot in recent times. Occult promotion is quite blatant with madonna becoming a Kabbalah practitioner. (https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/kabbalah-strange-ancient-jewish-mysticism-that-madonna-popularised-1507927)

Occult symbols, ritual murders, even direct mentioning of secret societies, masonic initiation and occult ceremonies in movies, tv shows, music videos is now pretty common. So many comic artists are occultists and encode their works with occult themes (Grant Morrison, Alan Moore etc).
Not just comics but also movies, music videos, fashion magazines are full of occult symbolism. Even music award shows turn into occult ceremonies with celebrity performances full of reference to occult concepts.

Performance during a music award show alluding to masonic initiation

Occult Symbology is everywhere in popular culture. Example of some movies with Occult themes are Rosemary Baby, Eyes Wide Shut, Wickerman, From Hell.

New age spirituality is just the same occult revival according to many researchers.

Many of the occult practices and beliefs revived by the modern NAM were a part of very early pagan cultures. Many practices common to the NAM, such as witchcraft/sorcery, spiritism, divination, (clairvoyance; seeing the future), necromancy (consulting the dead), and astrology, are clearly and strongly condemned in Scripture (Deuteronomy 18: 9-17; Isaiah 47: 9-15). These and other occultic practices were spread through the ancient magic and mystery religions of the Chaldeans, Egyptians, and most notably, the Assyrian-Babylonian culture.
(http://www.rapidnet.com/~jbeard/bdm/Cults/newage.htm)

Famous movies based on the teachings of the new age include Matrix, Star Wars, Space Odyssey 2001, Avatar.

Movies, music videos, fashion magazine etc are full of occult symbols.  Why is the entertainment industry obsessed with the occult?

“The issue of controlling humanity with esoteric words and symbols encoded within a play, a media spectacular or a ritual is one of the most difficult for people to comprehend. That is why most people are viewed with utter contempt as “cowans,” “the profane,” the “gentiles” and the “goyim” (cattle) by secret society initiates.” –  Secret Societies and Psychological Warfare Book by Michael A. Hoffman II

Advertisements

Think Tanks: The Brain Trusts of the Shadow Government

 

080421-N-0696M-274
At think tank Atlantic Council – Media mogul Rupert Murdoch, former British Prime Minister Tony Blair, Atlantic Council president Frederick Kempe and Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

Introduction

Think Tanks are powerful organizations that set the policy agenda in the United States and in many other countries. The big think tanks such as Council on Foreign Relations, Brookings Institution, American Enterprise Institute etc decide both the domestic and foreign policy of the United States. Other purposes think tanks serve includes providing the personnel for the administration after an election, people who are members of these big think tanks, go on to hold important positions in the government.
Here is an overview of think tanks.

Table of Contents:

1. What are think tanks and their Importance
2. Classifying think tanks
3. History of think tanks
4. Funding of think tanks
5. Think tank Personnel
6. Think tanks market their Ideas
7. Some of the key think tanks

What are think tanks and their Importance

Think tanks are organizations that conduct research and devise public policies. Think tanks apart from research are also involved in advocacy of their recommended policies. Think Tanks are also called policy institutes and policy making organizations. They research a wide range of topics such as economics, education, health policy, foreign policy, resources and energy policy, defense, population issues, urbanization, scientific policies etc. In fact hundreds of these think tanks research all areas concerning both politics and society. Think tanks are mostly private and nonprofit organizations. According to the 2016 Global Go To Think Tank Index (GGTTI) report, there are about 6846 think tanks around the globe, most of them are located in the US (1835). Think tanks are not homogeneous and vary in terms of size, structure, budget, scope and impact. Name of some of the prominent think tanks are RAND Corporation, Brookings Institution, Council on Foreign Relations, Club of Rome, Hudson Institute, Atlantic Council.

Think

                              GGTTI Report showing total think tanks and their distribution.

The word think tank was popularized in the late 1950s to mention policy research organizations. The word has its origin in World War II, where the name was used to refer rooms where strategists discussed war planning.
Here is another description from university of Oxford –
Think tanks are public policy research institutes that seek to play a key role in making and influencing global, regional and national policy. While each think tank serves a specific purpose, they all share a common vision to improve their respective spectrums, as well as being sources of new ideas and research.Think tanks engage in research and advocacy in areas such as social policy, political strategy, the economy, the environment, science and technology, industrial or business policies, military analysis, and many more. Think tank researchers influence public opinion and public policy, which is a different focus from traditional academic research at a university. (source-https://www.careers.ox.ac.uk/think-tanks/)

Think tanks play a central role in the policy making process. Think tanks have often been called factory of ideas and policy mills. Think tanks are essential for the elite’s research and planning.
Think tanks provide the research, analysis, strategies and solutions concerning a wide variety of topics and issues. These elitist think tanks like CFR, AEI, Brookings keep on working on the micro and macro levels of their various agendas around the globe. The think tanks elite set up and continue to fund have millions of dollars in annual budget. The big think tanks have the monetary power and the outreach and easily undermine the smaller think tanks. It doesn’t matter which party comes to power, the ideas, strategies and policies come from these same think tanks. As researcher Laurence H. Shoup writes regarding CFR, the most influential think tank in the world, in his book Wall Street’s Think Tank: The Council on Foreign Relations and the Empire of Neoliberal Geopolitics, 1976-2014 – ” The think tank of monopoly-finance capital, the Council on Foreign Relations is the world’s most powerful private organization. The CFR is the ultimate networking, socializing, strategic-planning, and consensus-forming institution of the U.S. capitalist class. It is the central “high command” organization of the plutocracy that runs the country and much of the world. ”
CFR is just one think tank at the elite’s disposal.
These think tanks plan out everything in advance. As mentioned earlier they have think tanks working on everything like environment, urbanization, immigration and even population control like the Optimum Population Trust now called Population Matters. Think tanks are the brain trusts of the shadow government and what we see happening now was all planned by these think tanks. (such things like urbanization, environmental treaties, privatization, trade deals, open borders, digital society, economic reforms, welfare schemes etc).

Many significant things have emerged from these think tanks. Here are just a few examples.

Council on Foreign Relations: United Nations, World Bank, International Monetary Fund- Following the war’s outbreak, the Council on Foreign Relations launched a massive War and Peace Studies project to explore the desirable foundations of postwar peace. The participants in this effort ultimately produced 682 memoranda for the State Department on topics ranging from the occupation of Germany to the creation of the United Nations. (Source- Richard N. Haass)
Designs for International Monetary Fund and the World Bank emerged from the same study project. Read more here on CFR and the creation of IMF and World Bank.

Brookings Institution: The Marshall Plan- When Congress began to craft the European aid program proposed by Marshall, Senator Arthur H. Vandenberg, chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, contacted Brookings President Harold G. Moulton and asked for the Institution’s help.Brookings “immediately responded in the highest spirit of cooperation and diverted its entire staff to this inquiry,” In less than four weeks, on January 22, 1948, Brookings produced a 20-page report, containing eight specific recommendations for the structure, focus, and operating procedures of the Marshall Plan, which was officially named the European Recovery Program. (Source- Brookings Institution)

The Heritage Foundation and Reagan: When President Reagan took office in 1981, he quickly gave every member of his cabinet an 1,100-page book from the Heritage Foundation, Mandate for Leadership, that provided an outline for conservative principles he wished to enact. Of its 2,000 recommendations, roughly 60% were accepted. (Source- Brookings article)

In 1992 a report by think tanks IIE and the Carnegie Endowment proposing an “economic security council.” The incoming Clinton administration implemented this proposal in creating a National Economic Council (a body that continues today). (Source- Richard N. Haass)

The RAND Corporation played a prominent role in the Cold War. The Club of Rome was behind the environmental movement.
New think tanks are formed for the need of the hour, like the Project for the New American Century (PNAC) which was a neoconservative think tank formed in 1997 and was responsible for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. It was dissolved it in 2006 after it had served its purpose.

29f7ba9c-b001-11e3-b97c-0025b511226e
Brezinski at a CSIS event

This is how the process works, both domestic and foreign policies are devised by these big think tanks, next the government ministers and officials who are also members of these think tanks, just implement these policies and finally the corporate media sells these policies to the unsuspecting public. Public opinion is necessary to back up these policies, especially those which have to do with wars and radical changes. Corporate media also has ties to these same think tanks. Media owners, editors and journalists are CFR members and also hold membership in other think tanks as well.
Another key point to mention is that these big think tanks like CFR, AEI, Brookings, CSIS, Trilateral Commision etc are interconnected. The big think tanks are closely knit together, through common founders, interlocking directorates, cross membership of people, similar sources of funding.
In this way we have a parallel government and the whole idea of democracy is under question. Think tanks are not accountable to the general public, they only answer to their Donors (which generally includes corporations, foundations and wealthy individuals). So another way to look at this process is – your country’s public policies are brought to you by Fortune 500 corporations, elite grant making foundations like Ford Foundation, Rockefeller Foundation, Carnegie Foundation and billionaires like Rothchild, Buffet, Soros etc.

Classifying think tanks

Like their definition and many other things related to them, there is no generally consensus among scholars regarding how to classify think tanks. Here is how I categorize think tanks. Based on location, affiliation, political orientation and area of research. The most precise way to classify them would be by their field of expertise or areas of research. Location, affiliation and political orientation are helpful but don’t tell much about them.

By Location- American think tank, Canadian think tank, British think tank etc. They can have branches in other countries as well. Some American think tanks are Council on Foreign Relations, RAND, Hudson Institute. Examples of some British think tank can be Chatham House, Adam Smith Institute, Demos.

By Affiliation- Are they affiliated to the government, university, political party or some other organization. Some examples

University: The Hoover Institution (Stanford University), The Belfer Center (Harvard University), Center for International Development (Harvard University).

Government: Congressional Research Service (US government), Development Concepts and Doctrine Centre (UK government).

Other Organizations: UN, World Bank, Corporations etc for example United Nations University (UNU), World Bank Institute (WBI).

Independent or no affiliations: CFR, Brookings, CSIS, Heritage Foundation.

By Political Orientation- Think tanks can have political orientation like they can be Libertarian, Liberal, Conservative, Marxist etc. Some examples

Conservative: The Heritage Foundation, Hudson Institute, Hoover Institution, Manhattan Institute

Liberal: The Roosevelt Institution, Institute for Policy Studies, Center for American Progress, Public Citizen.

Libertarian: Cato Institute, Adam Smith Institute, Cascade Policy Institute, Fraser Institute.

Independent: Brookings Institution, Council on Foreign Relations, RAND Corporation.

By Area of Research- What is their main focus. What research they specialize in. Areas like Foreign Policy and International Affairs, Economics, Environmental, Defense and Security, Immigration etc. Although they can and do have multiple areas of research. RAND for example researches many areas including education, economics, social policy etc but nevertheless its main focus is Defense & Security. Some examples

Foreign Policy and International Affairs: CFR,, Atlantic Council, Wilson Centre

Economics: NBER, Cato Institute, Mises Institute

Environment: Aspen Institute, Club of Rome

Defense & Security: RAND, CSIS, Hudson Institute

Social Policy: Brookings Institution, Urban Institute, Kaiser Foundation

Think Tank Networks
Think tanks can even form networks and work together. Below are few think tank networks.
Network of Democracy Research Institutes
Atlas Network
State Policy Network
Stockholm Network

History of think tanks

Independent policy research organizations date back to the 19th century. The Institute for Defence and Security Studies (RUSI) was founded in 1831 in London. The left leaning Fabian Society was formed in 1884 in London as well.
The oldest American think tank, the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, was founded in Washington, D.C. in 1910 by philanthropist Andrew Carnegie.
The Brookings Institution was founded shortly thereafter in 1916 by Robert S. Brookings
The Council on Foreign Relations was founded in 1921.
For most of the 20th century, independent public policy institutes that performed research and provided advice concerning public policy were found primarily in the United States, with a much smaller number in Canada, the UK and Western Europe. Although think tanks existed in Japan for some time, they generally lacked independence, having close associations with government ministries or corporations. There has been a veritable proliferation of “think tanks” around the world that began during the 1980s as a result of globalization, the end of the Cold War, and the emergence of transnational problems. Two-thirds of all the think tanks that exist today were established after 1970 and more than half were established since 1980. (source-wiki)

maxresdefault
Kerry speaking at Carnegie Endowment, the oldest think tank in US.

Funding of think tanks

Corporations and philanthropic foundations are the main sources of revenue for most of the big think tanks. Think tanks can although have other sources of funding that includes governments, wealthy individuals, endowments, also they derive their income from sales of their books, journals and other publications.

1. Corporations

2. Foundations
(grant making organizations)

3. Governments

4. Wealthy Individuals

5. Endowment Income

6. Sale of their publications like books and magazines

7. Other sources like contract income etc

Example- Breaking down the revenue sources of Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) – For Fiscal Year 2013, CSIS had an operating revenue of US $32.3 million. The sources were: 32% corporate, 29% foundation, 19% government, 9% individuals, 5% endowment, 6% other. (source- wiki)

Funding of the big think tanks.
If you will check out the annual reports and donor list that is issued by the big think tanks, you will always find the name of big corporations and foundations. Below are just some of them, also apart from noticing fortune 500 Corporations as donors, also notice the names of the elite foundations such as Carnegie Corporation of New York (Carnegie Foundation), Ford Foundation, Rockefeller Brothers Fund, Rockefeller Foundation, Open Society Foundations, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation etc.

CFR- (donor list 2016)
Brookings Institution- (Annual Report 2016)
Urban Institute- (Annual Report 2015)
RAND- (Annual Report 2015)
CSIS- (donors 2016)
PIIE- (Donors from 2013-15)
Hudson Institute- (Annual Report 2015)

Think tank Personnel

Board of Directors and members of think tanks include people from many different professions.

High level government officials- Leading politicians, diplomats, bureaucrats are members such as Brzezinski, Kissinger, Madeleine Albright etc have been board of directors and members of a number of think tanks. Presidents from Nixon to Obama have hired individuals from think tanks to fill positions in their administrations. This is another role of the big think tanks, to provide officials for the new government in Washington.

Corporate Executives- People from fortune 500 corporations are right there.

Academics- Professors and Scholars, especially from Ivy League Universities.

Journalists- All the renowned journalists are CFR members.

Officials from International Organizations- High ranking officials from United Nations, World Bank, IMF etc

Members may even include corporations and other institutions- CFR and Atlantic Council have corporate members.

Many of the elitists are head of these think tanks and they and their associates also serve as board of directors. David Rockefeller has been the head and board of director of CFR, PIIE, Trilateral Commission. His aides and associates such as Zbigniew Brzezinski and Peter George Peterson have headed and have been members of many think tanks (like PIIE, Trilateral Commision, CSIS, RAND, CFR, ICG).

The bigger think tanks have on board very Influential people from various fields.
Executives of corporations, diplomats, journalists, academics etc. Even senior government officials are members and in this way these think tanks are directly linked to policy makers.
Take for example the board of directors of Peterson Institute for International Economics (PIIE).

MEMBERS OF THE BOARD
Peter G. Peterson * (Chairman of the Board)
Founder and Chairman, Peter G. Peterson Foundation; former Senior Chairman, The Blackstone Group; former Secretary of Commerce and Assistant to the President for International Economic Policy
James W. Owens * (Chairman of the Executive Committee)
Chairman and CEO Emeritus of Caterpillar
Caroline Atkinson
Head of Global Policy, Google, Inc.
Ajay Banga
President and Chief Executive Officer, MasterCard
C. Fred Bergsten *
Senior Fellow and Director Emeritus, Peterson Institute for International Economics; former Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for International Affairs
Mark T. Bertolini
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President, Aetna
Ben van Beurden
CEO, Royal Dutch Shell
Nancy Birdsall
President, Center for Global Development; former Executive Vice-President of the Inter-American Development Bank
Frank Brosens
Principal, Cofounder, Taconic Capital Advisors L.P.
Ronnie C. Chan
Chairman, Hang Lung Properties Limited
Susan M. Collins
Joan and Sanford Weill Dean of Public Policy, Professor of Public Policy, and Professor of Economics, Gerald R. Ford School of Public Policy, University of Michigan
Richard N. Cooper
Maurits C. Boas Professor of International Economics, Harvard University
Andreas C. Dracopoulos *
Director and co-President, Stavros Niarchos Foundation
Barry Eichengreen
Professor, Department of Economics, University of California, Berkeley
Jessica Einhorn *
Former Dean, SAIS, Johns Hopkins University; former Managing Director for Finance and Resource Mobilization, World Bank
Peter Fisher
Senior Director, BlackRock Investment Institute; former Under Secretary of the Treasury for Domestic Finance
Douglas Flint
Group Chairman, HSBC Holdings plc.
Stephen Freidheim *
CIO, Founder and Managing Partner, Cyrus Capital Partners, LLC.
Jacob A. Frenkel
Chairman of JPMorgan Chase International, former Governor of the Bank of Israel; former IMF Economic Counselor and Director of Research.
Maurice R. Greenberg
Chairman and CEO, C.V. Starr and Co., Inc.; former Chairman, American International Group.
Herbjorn Hansson
Chairman and CEO, Nordic American Tankers Limited.
Stephen Howe, Jr.
US Chairman and Americas Managing Partner, Ernst & Young LLP
Hugh F. Johnston
Chief Financial Officer, PepsiCo, Inc.
Michael Klein
Managing Partner of M. Klein and Company, LLC; former Vice Chairman, Citigroup.
Nobuyori Kodaira
Member of the Board of Directors, Toyota Motor Corporation and Chairman, The Toyota Foundation.
Charles D. Lake II
President, Aflac International Incorporated, and Chairman, Aflac Japan.
Andrew N. Liveris
Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer, Dow Chemical Company.
Sergio Marchionne
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Chrysler Group LLC; Chief Executive Officer, Fiat S.p.A., and Chairman, Fiat Industrial S.p.A. and CNH Global N.V.
Pip McCrostie
Former Global Vice Chair – Transaction Advisory Services, EY.
Hutham S. Olayan *
President and CEO, Olayan America.
Peter R. Orszag
Vice Chairman of Investment Banking and Managing Director, Lazard Freres & Co.
Michael A. Peterson *
President and Chief Executive Officer, Peter G. Peterson Foundation.
Jonathan Pruzan
Chief Financial Officer, Morgan Stanley
Ginni M. Rometty
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, International Business Machines Corporation.
Lynn Forester de Rothschild *
CEO and President, E.L. Rothschild Limited.
Richard E. Salomon *
Managing Partner, East End Advisors, LLC.
Sheikh Hamad Saud Al-Sayari
Former Governor, Saudi Arabian Monetary Agency.
Lawrence H. Summers *
Charles W. Eliot University Professor, Harvard University; former Secretary of the Treasury; former Chair of the National Economic Council.
Mostafa Terrab
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, President, OCP S.A.
Ronald A. Williams
Retired Chairman and CEO, Aetna Inc.
Min Zhu
Deputy Managing Director, International Monetary Fund
Robert B. Zoellick *
Chairman of the Board of Directors, AllianceBernstein; former President, World Bank Group; former US Trade Representative.
(source- https://piie.com/about/board-directors)

This is clearly a highly influential network of people. PIIE is just one example, all big think tanks have this type of board of directors.

Think tanks market their Ideas

Think tanks not only develop ideas but also disseminates them. They intend to influence both the government policy makers and the the general public. For think tanks advocacy is as important as research. Think tanks are at the forefront in the battle of ideas. What they research is not kept in complete secrecy and they do publish their research findings and policy recommendations. Ideas are marketed through their publications and digital content. They have their own journals, magazines, they publish monographs, memorandums, books, policy papers, reports, write articles on their website, they make audio and video content, they organize conferences, seminars, panel discussion, workshops etc. The big thanks like CFR also invite world leaders to speak at their institution. Policy makers are their prime target. They seek to provide advice directly to officials in government departments and agencies and through congressional hearings and testimonies.

Page1 [www.imagesplitter.net]
Scholars from Hudson Institute on various TV channels (Hudson Report 2015)

Another way think tanks tend to influence the public is by their media presence. The scholars from think tanks write articles in renowned newspapers and are also regularly invited by mainstream media for their expert opinion, analysis & commentary. You will notice people from these big think tanks on news channels very often. This is how they influence both policy makers and the public. They compete with others not only in the policy making arena but also in the realm of public opinion.

Some of the key think tanks-

Council on Foreign Relations (CFR)

cfr

Founded: 1921

Location: New York City, New York, U.S.

Political Orientation: Independent

Revenue: $ 77 Million (2015)

Journal: Foreign Affairs

Website: https://www.cfr.org/

Brookings Institution

Brookings

Founded: 1916

Location: Washington, DC, U.S

Political Orientation: Independent

Revenue: $ 108 Million (2016)

Journals: Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economia, and Behavioral Science & Policy.

Website: https://www.brookings.edu/

Chatham House (Royal Institute of International Affairs)

Chattam House

Founded: 1920

Location: London, England

Political Orientation: Independent

Revenue: £ 15 Million (2016)

Journal/Magazines: International Affairs and The World Today.

Website: https://www.chathamhouse.org

The Club of Rome

club of rome.png

Founded: 1968

Location: Zurich, Switzerland

Political Orientation: Independent

Website: https://www.clubofrome.org/

RAND Corporation

Rand-logo

Founded: 1948

Location: Santa Monica, California, U.S.

Political Orientation: Independent

Revenue: $ 351 Million (2014)

Journal/Magazines: RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Review

Website: http://www.rand.org/

Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

Carniegie

Founded: 1910

Location: Washington, D.C., U.S.

Political Orientation: Independent

Revenue: $ 34 Million (2015)

Website: http://carnegieendowment.org/

Atlantic Council

Atlantic Council

Founded: 1961

Location: Washington, D.C., U.S.

Political Orientation: Conservative

Affiliation: Atlantic Treaty Association.

Revenue: $ 21 Million (2016)

Website: http://www.atlanticcouncil.org/

Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS)

CSIS

Founded: 1962

Location: Washington, D.C, United States

Political Orientation: Independent

Revenue: $ 43 Million (2014)

Journals: The Washington Quarterly, New Perspectives in Foreign Policy

Website: https://www.csis.org/

Hudson Institute

Hudson Institute

Founded: 1961

Location: Washington, D.C., United States

Political Orientation: Conservative

Revenue: $ 13 Million (2016)

Website: https://www.hudson.org/

International Crisis Group

International Crisis Group

Founded: 1995

Location: Brussels, Belgium

Political Orientation: Independent

Website: https://www.crisisgroup.org

Aspen Institute

AspenLogoBlue_15

Founded: 1950

Location: Washington, D.C., United States

Political Orientation: Independent

Revenue: $ 101 Million (2014)

Magazine: IDEAS

Website: https://www.aspeninstitute.org/

American Enterprise Institute

AEI

Founded: 1938

Location: Washington, D.C., U.S.

Political Orientation: Conservative

Revenue: $ 84 Million (2015)

Magazine: The American

Website: http://aei.org/

Urban Institute

Urban_Institute_1313571

Founded: 1968

Location: Washington, D.C., U.S.

Political Orientation: Liberal

Revenue: $ 95.3 Million (2015)

Website: http://www.urban.org/

National Bureau of Economic Research

NBER

Founded: 1920

Location: Washington, D.C., U.S.

Political Orientation: Independent

Revenue: $ 35 Million (2014)

Website: https://nber.org/

Peterson Institute for International Economics

PEIE.jpg

Founded: 1981

Location: Washington, D.C., U.S.

Political Orientation: Independent

Revenue: $ 11 Million (2014)

Website: https://piie.com/

The Heritage Foundation

Heritage Foundation

Founded: 1973

Location: Washington, D.C., U.S.

Political Orientation: Conservative

Revenue: $ 96 Million (2014)

Journal: Policy Review (1977-2013)

Website: http://www.heritage.org/

Center for American Progress

CAP

Founded: 2003

Location: Washington, D.C., U.S.

Political Orientation: Liberal

Revenue: $ 45 Million (2014)

Website: https://www.americanprogress.org/

Cato Institute

Cato

Founded: 1974

Location: Washington, D.C., U.S

Political Orientation: Libertarian

Revenue: $ 72 Million (2015)

Journals: Cato Journal, Regulation

Website: https://www.cato.org/

Manhattan Institute for Policy Research

Logo_Manhattan_Institute

Founded: 1977

Location: New York, U.S.

Political Orientation: Conservative

Journal: City Journal

Website: https://www.manhattan-institute.org/

The Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs

bcsia-cX965DAGVjdnnotdqiNcKUpzBffftt_k

Founded: 1973

Location: Massachusetts, U.S.

Political Orientation: Independent

Affiliation: Harvard University

Website: http://www.belfercenter.org/